Reviews for Image Max URL
Image Max URL by qsniyg
Review by Firefox user 15775202
Rated 1 out of 5
by Firefox user 15775202, 6 years agoWorthless. Tried it on at least a dozen sites. Image size it found was ALWAYS the same size as the image I started with.
Developer response
posted 6 years agoDoes it work with the example image provided in the addon's description? (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DlOC3mOWsAEi1ld.jpg , it should redirect to https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DlOC3mOWsAEi1ld.jpg?name=orig )
To be clear (as stated in the description), it doesn't perform a reverse image search, so it's not necessarily unlikely that the sites you checked didn't have a larger version available that was stored on the site itself. Since I'm not sure which sites you tested it on, I can't really give any specific help regarding the images you tested, sorry!
If however there is a larger version (for example, the link I posted above, an album cover on iTunes, non-original images on Twitter/Instagram/Flickr, etc.) and the script fails to find it, please let me know!
Since (I believe) firefox addons don't allow multiple replies, please feel free to contact me in any of the contact links listed in the addon's description (github, reddit, or discord). I'll try my best to help! :)
To be clear (as stated in the description), it doesn't perform a reverse image search, so it's not necessarily unlikely that the sites you checked didn't have a larger version available that was stored on the site itself. Since I'm not sure which sites you tested it on, I can't really give any specific help regarding the images you tested, sorry!
If however there is a larger version (for example, the link I posted above, an album cover on iTunes, non-original images on Twitter/Instagram/Flickr, etc.) and the script fails to find it, please let me know!
Since (I believe) firefox addons don't allow multiple replies, please feel free to contact me in any of the contact links listed in the addon's description (github, reddit, or discord). I'll try my best to help! :)
141 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by Kamik, 3 hours agoCould you make feature that on activating with holding RMB it will block a little native context menu?
- Rated 5 out of 5by busloadmagenta, 4 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by 退出党团队远离中共邪教, 6 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 20168099, 13 days ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Ugarov, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17267513, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 15185624, 2 months agoAwesome addon. Extremely practical. Very complete.
- Rated 5 out of 5by FieryOx, 3 months agoForget searching for larger images than the original one across the web, you got this extension to provide the solution to your dilemma with a few clicks.
- Rated 5 out of 5by TheSlayer, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Benjy, 3 months agoMany thanks for this tool. I was using Imagus for years which worked for most sites but my bugbear is that it stopped working with Flickr and the more up-to-date Imagus forks didn't work with Flickr either. Image Max URL does work with it though and I like the custom key settings I can use with it :-)
- Rated 5 out of 5by Nijaz, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Deka, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Cryten56, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19893749, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Gakuran, 5 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Sarah Zhang, 6 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by John_C, 7 months agoWhoever made this add on needs to be directly accepted in heaven by the God ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️
- Rated 5 out of 5by postcards, 7 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by PMiles, 8 months agoGreat app!!! Just unlocked the secrets after having it for a year. Definitely beats looking through developer tools, source code, and page info. Its even finding the larger images where i normally have to resize my browser to try and find the full size image.
I wonder if a little icon "up-scale image/s" would be helpful. I'm not always thinking to hit the key to enlarge things, and always active "hover" is too aggressive for general browsing.
I little tag either like the ones used by apps to rate or mark links as safe, or oh my, maybe like the floating Grammarly icon.
The first gives a coded (Yea/Nea) icon next to various elements with links.
The latter gives a floating red or blue ring around a number of things to improve... for you, it could be a number of images available to up-size. (Not sure if the latter needs an active element). But then, the first might only truly work on the search engines and is coded specifically knowing the Elements for the popular search engines. But then, if you can float the full image on hover, you should be able to hover an icon.Developer response
posted 8 months agoThis is a great idea, thanks for suggesting!
I've tracked the former suggestion here: https://github.com/qsniyg/maxurl/issues/1570 . Edit: Implemented, it'll be in a future release.
The latter (if I understand correctly) can be done through:
- Buttons -> Highlight Images -> Automatically highlight images -> Always (or Hover)
- ^ -> ^ -> Only explicitly supported images -> Yes.
You can change the highlight ring color through the Highlight CSS style (e.g. outline: 2px solid #77f; border-radius: 5px ). Note that this currently will not work for all images, such as images that are displayed as a div+background-image style. - Rated 5 out of 5by elsenfox, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 14153470, 8 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by girlygirl, 9 months agohad for 1 year or more i think. i love this extension, it's the only of it's kind that finds the maximum resolution of an online image. even for websites that make it hard to get the highest resolution image this app never disappoints me. i used to use it on Chrome but they banned it so now i just use it on FireFox and Microsoft Edge. hope they never get rid of it.
Developer response
posted 9 months agoGlad to hear it's useful for you!
Regarding Chrome, I haven't updated the (sideloaded) extension to Manifest V3 yet, which is why it can't be installed under newer versions of Chrome. I'm not sure if it's possible or not without reducing its featureset, but it's something I'll look into in the future.
In the meantime, if you do still want to use it with Chrome browsers, you can still use it as a userscript (using something like Tampermonkey or ScriptCat), which has most of the functionality of the addon. - Rated 5 out of 5by safeAnonym, 9 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by max, 9 months ago